Pages

Monday, 25 July 2016

Abandoned!

If you happen to live in Reydon, Wangford, Wenhaston, Halesworth or Holton today is not a good day, particularly if you happen to be a fare payer. You see Anglian Bus have done it again - decided you good people are not worthy of a convenient bus service if you happen to want to go to your nearest big town, ie Lowestoft. From today the 61 no longer operates between Kessingland and Southwold, leaving most of Reydon, Wangford and South Wrentham without a direct service to Lowestoft for the first time in many years. But it also has knock on effects. When Anglian withdrew the 62 last year between Halesworth and Southwold, they said passengers from Halesworth Holton, Wenhaston and Blythburgh needing to get to Lowestoft could catch the 88A to Southwold and change to the 61. Of course earlier this year those same passengers were disencouraged from making the journey due to ridiculous waiting times for connections in Southwold.

Now to get from Blythburgh to Lowestoft - both located on the A12 remember - it will mean the 88A to Southwold, then a 99 to Lowestoft. If you're in Wangford you need to get the 146 to Pakefield and change there to the 99. Either way if you are a fare payer you have been priced out of the market due to having to use multiple operators and still the lack of a multi-operator ticket that the rest of the country seems to have. In other words tough - we want your money as the council don't give us enough for Concessionary passes but make the bus an attractive option for those not in major towns or cities? Don't be silly - we'd rather not run a bus at all than make an effort to encourage passenger use with sensible timetabling and financial incentives.

The good old days of the 62
 But fare payers of Blythburgh and Wenhaston fear not for I have devised a way you can travel the 15 or so miles to Lowestoft and not have to pay twice - are you sitting comfortably? Good because you'll need the practice.

First of all you will need to catch the 0913 88A from Blythburgh to Halesworth (0918 Wenhaston). Jump off pretty quick as you only have 2 mins to make the connection at Halesworth onto the 0935  60H to Beccles arriving at 1007. Again you'll need to be pretty sharpish getting off as you need to immediately jump on the 1010 service 81 to Great Yarmouth, arriving at  1050. There you can link up with the new not much improved 61, leaving at 1105, arriving in Lowestoft at 1153. Not bad - only 160 mins to do 15 miles. Now let's look at the return journey shall we assuming you only want a couple of hours in Lowestoft. Ok you can't have a couple of hours as you need to get the 1325 back to Yarmouth so no time for a leisurely lunch I'm afraid. Once at Yarmouth you can catch the 1417 service 81 to Beccles arriving at 1457. Oh dear we have now hit a slight problem as the next bus back to Halesworth doesn't leave until 1720 so you might as well have lunch in Lowestoft after all. Back to the drawing board. Instead get the 1525 from Lowestoft to Yarmouth but make sure you get off at Southtown Rd as the Beccles bus leaves Market Gates a minute before the 61 gets in. This will mean you get to Beccles at 1652 and only have to wait 28 mins for the 60H, getting to Halesworth at 1755. Oh hang on what's this? The last 88A to Southwold which until today left Halesworth at 1815 has been cut, the last one being 1715 so you're stranded in Halesworth. Sorry about that let's try again.

So back to plan A - have your 2 hours in Lowestoft, catch the 1355 61 from Lowestoft to Yarmouth, jump on Konect's new service 7 at 1435 to Norwich, which you can use your all day (no kidding) ticket on then catch the 1600 X88 to Halesworth which becomes the 1715 88A arriving at Blythburgh at 1729. Simple really isn't it! Oh just one thing - from the end of August the 81 times change again, and that morning connection at Beccles you make by 3 mins? Sorry - the 81 will now leave 5 mins earlier so it won't connect anymore. Still fancy catching the bus? Yet more communities effectively cut off through damned incompetence and yet again it's the fare payer who suffers the most - the very people we are told should be encouraged to use the bus more often.

However if you live in Bungay, Beccles or Haddiscoe you are going to see a dramatic improvement in your bus service. On 15th August Borderbus launch their new 580 service between Beccles and Yarmouth. The service will operate hourly between 0816 and 1432 via Shipmeadow, re-introducing the fast link between Bungay and Beccles that proved so popular, and James Paget Hospital, thus reinstating a direct link from Beccles - JPH that was lost when Anglian withdrew the 60. For the first two weeks Anglian will be operating the current 80/81 timetable but from August 29th Anglian will be going commercial between Bungay and Yarmouth, also operating via Shipmeadow but then current route to Yarmouth. Although operating less journeys per day than Borderbus Anglian do operate the earliest and latest journeys. If the 580 proves successful I would expect Borderbus to increase afternoon journeys as they have done with the 146. Also from August 29th Simonds begin operating the Diss - Beccles part of the route, renumbered 581, and two journeys each way a day will connect with the 580 at Beccles. The 581 will operate the existing route between Bungay and Beccles but as yet I do not know if there will be mutual ticket acceptance on the 580/581. Borderbus are also taking over the Beccles Town Service, with four morning journeys a day Monday - Friday. *UPDATE: Just been informed that there WILL be mutual ticket acceptance between the 580 and 581. Good. Let that be the start.

Speaking of the 146 yesterday marked the second anniversary of the launch of the 146, and my how the route has flourished in that time. I predicted deckers would soon be needed and sure enough a 3rd Gemini arrived on Friday. Four more record days last week with figures for July currently showing a 71& increase in passenger numbers and 90% increase in revenue compared to July 2015  Now if only they could take over the Halesworth corridors too!





16 comments:

  1. Maybe someone at Anglian writes a load of numbers,put them in a bucket and holds an (un)lucky dip. roll up roll up, pick out a number and that's the time your bus departs today. Really, you could not make it up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is unbelievable the way Anglian are treating the public but then it is unbelievable how they have managed to turn a much loved thriving business into this laughing stock , How can you go from 100 busses with passengers waiting for your bus rather than getting on another companies bus to about 29ish busses and dropping routes left right and center and call it sensible business practice , They are just pissing off the very people who made Anglian a success in the first place , But then Go Ahead know what they are doing !!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go-Ahead have been going backwards since the arrived in the area. But we are not alone - Hedingham is also being slowly destroyed, and they are hardly making a success of their rail franchises either. A public transport revolution is needed - who's up for the fight?

      Delete
    2. I've no love for Go-Ahead but I'm not sure it's right they're destroying Hedingham. Sure they lost a few routes in the April tendering but gained a few too. (And three depots within less than a 20 mile radius in the countryside is just too many, for anybody). Largely consolidating their operations, as they have now with all three Tollesbury routes, reinatated with support from the County Council. That's sense, not stupidity. And there's the rub, Suffolk CC don't play their part. In Suffolk it's just harder to make buses work, particularly as a network mainly because Suffolk County Council don't see buses as a network. (Maybe too they see the East Suffolk line as THE public transport with buses filling in the gaps; many rural areas elsewhere don't have the same rail network as East Suffolk and Norfolk).

      Pardon me if I'm wrong, but Borderbus (who can be choosers without a legacy network) seems mostly to provide end to end services rather than a network as such. I suspect they are easier to make work, especially when the destination is Norwich. Suffolk play the same game, they support services X to Y, not if you want to be different and change buses. It's easier, and cheaper to provide that way.

      Delete
  3. My uncle came down from Yorkshire and try ed to use the bus from holton to haleswortha couple of times.1st bus was 20 minutes late and the second time it arrived 5 minutes and missed it obviously.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What's this? http://www.border-bus.co.uk/media/docs/Beccles_Town_Service.pdf

    Hmmmm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. how come they havent got the timetables for the 580

      Delete
    2. What we have acros mkost of the country is the constant nibling away of what is left of the bus services. THere is also the lack of stability. One day you my have a bus service the next it has gone or you get operators changing so suddenly you find your cost of getting fronm A to B has doubled or even trebled

      Bus services are a very sorry decling mess in my view

      Delete
    3. Lol you clearly didn't read the post carefully enough!

      "Borderbus are also taking over the Beccles Town Service, with four morning journeys a day Monday - Friday."

      The tietable for the 580 can be viewed on the suffolkonboard website, or by pasting this link into your address bar

      http://www.suffolkonboard.com/buses/bus-service-changes/august-2016/

      Delete
    4. The proof of the pudding will be when BB can sustain the Beccles Town services. Both First and Anglian have provided them too, but just didn't last the course.

      Around the Shires it looks as though small town and peripheral urban routes (not serving town centres) need financial support from councils to survive. If someone can find a magic formula so they don't, then that'd be progress! Too many operators are remote (in every sense of the word). But surely (I hope) having a good relationship locally with the passengers, helps. If it doesn't, then I don't know what will.

      Delete
    5. Funny you should mention the Town Service, which I was discussing with the boss only Friday. Already operating costs are minimal with the driver concerned doing schools am, providing break cover for the 581 the schools pm. So filling in those 3 hours the Town Service operates basically only requires the diesel to be covered.

      However there are some bureaucratic reasons why that particular route is tough to make money on, and BB have come up with a unique experiment. At this time I cannot reveal what it is, but if it works I'm sure I'll be able to reveal it!

      Delete
  5. Thomas Browne) I think anglian's days are numbered. I would be surprised if there still around for the next few years. Anglian's livery should be dark as its future is not looking as bright as yellow.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Looks like the gas buses are off to Plymouth in the next few weeks. Wonder what scrap Anglian will bring in to replace them, or if that finally is the end for Anglian?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am currently trying to get confirmation of this - rumours have been circulating for some weeks now. Post to follow.

      Delete
  7. I understand everyone's concern about Anglian. I really do.

    But I think if you had First Essex to contend with, you'd really know what it's like to have something to complain about. The passengers would be happy with Go-Ahead (or anyone else you could care to mention) back.

    Buses virtually never on time, and late means 30 minutes, 45 minutes and longer (even for routes with a 10 minute timetabled frequency!) Even if you generously put 50% down to traffic, what is cause of the rest? Their own "problems". Buses dropped without information or explanation, especially commuting, and evening/Sunday services which are sparse enough already. A ramshackle as well as regularly dirty unkempt fleet so you never know what (as well as if anything) will turn up, or in what condition. And disinterested staff, which is hardly surprising really. It's network-wide. What is going on? I don't think anyone has a clue. Their own CS are beginning to appear as exasperated as the passengers. Hardly surprising; it looks as though everyone gets treated with the same contempt. We can't even blame First HQ, it's all down to local management (or lack of it). Give them credit, they seem to change the local management like the weather. It makes no difference, either.

    I suspect at the root of it they are trying to do far too much with far too little resources, and their incessant timetable tinkering just makes things worse, and their staff on the ground (rather than the ones with their heads in the clouds) are simply completely overwhelmed. The passengers aren't. That's putting it generously. It's a complete car crash.

    They try very hard to trap passengers into paid-for-in-advance season tickets. It's not hard to see why. And why so many of their passengers soon decide "never again".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I mustn't forget their favourite trick: failing to pick up the waiting passengers. What do they think buses are for?

      Delete